An Overhaul or a Tweak for Pensions
Published: August 26, 2009, New York Times
After more than three years of deliberations, the board that sets the
accounting rules for state and city governments is still far away from issuing a
new standard for public pension funds.
Diann Shipione, who was a whistle-blower in San Diego, called
for clearer guidelines.
What may seem like tedious labors over technical matters can have a large
impact on public employees, taxpayers and investors. Many municipalities around
the country are grappling with serious shortfalls in their pension funds caused
by the recession and other woes.
Since the deliberations began, San Diegofs finances have been rocked by a
pension scandal; Vallejo, Calif., has filed for bankruptcy after promising
costly benefits; and New Jersey has warned that it lacks the cash to comply with
its actuaryfs instructions.
The panel, the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, heard impassioned
testimony on Wednesday on the need to make public pension numbers more
straightforward, more closely mirroring the pension accounting for corporations.
But proponents of an overhaul were countered at every step by state officials
and others who testified that broad changes were unnecessary and would disrupt
budgets by introducing market volatility.
The board, an independent nonprofit organization that sets the accounting
standards for governments, has said that the next step will be the publication,
by next May, of a gdue process documenth to offer possible changes in the rules.
That will engender a new round of public comment and revisions, and eventually a
new pension accounting standard. The process is expected to take several more
years.
gI have concerns that these efforts may, in fact, be too late,h one speaker,
Diann Shipione, told the board. She said that the existing accounting rules were
too loose, allowing gpension mischiefh to go on for many years.
gAs a result of the fuzziness and imprecision,h she said, gwe now have many
large systems that are essentially insolvent.h
Ms. Shipione, a former trustee of the San Diego city pension fund, eventually
became a whistle-blower, insisting that the fundfs financial reporting was
false, constituting securities fraud. After a long legal battle, the Securities
and Exchange Commission agreed with her. She is now earning a masterfs degree in
public administration at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard.
Ms. Shipione told the accounting board that she thought revisions were needed
to make it easier to see when states and cities were falling behind on their
pension contributions, which she hoped would prompt them to pump more money into
the plans.
But some members of the board took issue with her goals. William W. Holder,
one member of the accounting board, told Ms. Shipione that the boardfs duty was
to write rules that produced accurate and informative financial reports — not to
promote desirable activities like funding pension plans more robustly.
gWe try to avoid bias in setting accounting standards,h he said. gWhat we
donft try to do is develop some preconceived notion of what that behavior would
be, and then write a standard that would encourage it.h
In the corporate world, the Financial
Accounting Standards Board writes the rules for pension disclosures. It also
seeks to avoid bias, and also works at a slow, deliberative pace.
But FASB has a great deal more power and independence than its governmental
cousin. Its rules are enforced by the S.E.C., and it was given an independent
funding source in the post-Enron
accounting reforms. The corporate pension accounting rules came under harsh
criticism at the beginning of this decade, and the FASB has already issued some
revisions. Others are still in the works.
The governmental board, by contrast, must still raise its own money. And
because no government agency enforces its policies, it must issue rules that
states and municipalities will adopt voluntarily. Six of its seven members work
on a part-time basis.
Others who spoke on Wednesday sought to assure the accounting board that its
existing rules were sound. They acknowledged that some governments had had
pension debacles in the last few years but said that was because they did not
follow the rules.
Robert A. Wylie, executive director of the South Dakota Retirement System,
said that pension woes were largely absent in his state and that his plan had a
well-established funding policy.
Mr. Wylie said South Dakota had the ability to reduce promised benefits when
times were tight, something forbidden by statute or constitution in many other
states. Because of this flexibility, he said, South Dakota had always been able
to keep its contributions in line with its benefits. For a state like South
Dakota, he said, the existing pension rules were gvery workable.h
gMajor changes may add to what would be, in our mind, confusion,h he said.
Questions posed by the board members suggested they were leaning toward
making narrow changes in the existing rules, like shortening amortization
schedules or reducing the number of actuarial methods that plans may use. They
did not seem eager to grapple with the question of which discount rate to use to
measure public pension obligations — the biggest issue in the minds of critics
of the current rules.
A recent study published by the National
Bureau of Economic Research found that the discount rates now in use were
masking a pension shortfall of $1.2 trillion at the state level.
The questions from the board members also suggested that they were interested
in making public pension funds more comparable to each other. The current
accounting rules allow so much flexibility that comparisons can be unfair.
Jeremy Gold, an actuary and economist who testified at Wednesdayfs meeting,
said he expected that when the new standard was finally issued, it would improve
the comparability of pension plans.
gThe center of gravity is still in favor of sharper pencils, rather than a
whole new way of doing things,h said Mr. Gold, who called for radical changes.
gThis will make Texas, California and New Jersey all comparable while they go to
hell in a handbasket.h
The accounting board will reconvene in Washington on Friday for additional
testimony.
A version of this article appeared in print on
August 27, 2009, on page B1 of the New York edition.